Main Article Content

Abstract

Occupational noise is one of the main preventable hazards that can seriously affect workers' health and productivity, causing noise-induced hearing loss. This study aims to analyze the relationship between noise exposure, age, and length of service with the level of hearing loss among workers in the textile weaving industry at PT X. This analytical observational study with a cross-sectional design was conducted on 30 workers in the textile weaving industry in Surakarta using purposive sampling techniques. Data were obtained through noise intensity measurements and audiometric examinations. Bivariate analysis was performed using the Spearman Rank test with a significance level of 0.05. The results showed that the average noise level at the workplace reached 90.78 dB, with the highest exposure in Room 5 Ring Line C at 104.78 dB. The correlation test showed a significant relationship between age (r= 0.411; p=0.024) and length of service (r=0.400; p=0.029) with the left ear hearing threshold value, while noise intensity was not significantly related. This indicates that individual factors and job characteristics such as age and length of service play a more dominant role in hearing loss than variations in workplace noise levels. It is concluded that there is a significant relationship between age and length of service and a decrease in the left ear hearing threshold of workers.

Keywords

Noise hearing impairment length of service age textile industry

Article Details

How to Cite
Suratna, F. S. N., Paskanita, M., Sumardiyono, S., Rinawati, S., Atmojo, T. B., Ismayeti, L., Utomo, B., Rha, W. Y. and Gustav, J. S. (2025) “Risk of Hearing Impairment due to Noise Exposure among Textile Industry Workers at PT X in 2025”, Miracle Journal of Public Health , 8(2), pp. 222-230. doi: 10.36566/mjph.v8i2.488.

References

  1. 1. Rijwani T, et al. Industry 5.0: A Review Of Emerging Trends And Transformative Technologies In The Next Industrial Revolution. Int J Interact Des Manuf. 2025;667–679.
  2. doi:10.1007/s12008-024-01943-7
  3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-024-01943-7
  4. 2. Milea A, Cioca L. Industry 4.0 / Industry 5.0. In: MATEC Web Conf. 2024;00074.
  5. Available from: https://www.matec-conferences.org
  6. 3. Shelly C, Kaloyan K, Alarcos C. The world report on hearing. World Health Organization; 2021.
  7. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8085630/
  8. 4. Azad TNS, Faysal GM, Moon JM. The industrial health hazard among workers of apparel sector in Bangladesh. Indones J Occup Saf Health. 2022;11:133–142.
  9. 5. Sivakumaran K, Ritonja J, Waseem H, et al. Impact of noise exposure on risk of developing stress-related cardiovascular health effects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Noise Health. 2022;24:107–129.
  10. doi:10.4103/nah.nah_83_21
  11. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/nohe/fulltext/2022/24140/impact_of_noise_exposure_on_risk_of_developing.1.aspx
  12. 6. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Noise and hearing loss [Internet]. 2024.
  13. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/noise/about/noise.html
  14. 7. Clark C, Paunovic K. WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: a systematic review on environmental noise and quality of life, wellbeing and mental health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(11):2400.
  15. doi:10.3390/ijerph15112400
  16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112400
  17. 8. Azwina R, et al. Strategi industri manufaktur dalam meningkatkan percepatan pertumbuhan ekonomi di Indonesia. Profit J Manajemen Bisnis Akunt. 2023;2:44–55.
  18. 9. Djatmika GH. Tartib: Jurnal of educational management. J Educ Manag. 2025;4:56–81.
  19. 10. Ardilla L, Munaya F, Dihartawan, Dadang HE. Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan tindakan tidak aman (unsafe action) pada pekerja produksi PT X. Environ Occup Health Saf J. 2022;2:133–146.
  20. 11. Tri B, Erza YP. Stres kerja pada pekerja di bagian tenun. J Kesmas. 2010;4:76–143.
  21. 12. Lie A, Skogstad M, Johannessen HA, Tynes T. Occupational noise exposure and hearing: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016;89:351–372.
  22. doi:10.1007/s00420-015-1083-5
  23. 13. Agarwal G, Nagpure PS, Pal KS, Kaushal AK. Audiometric notching at 4 kHz: good screening test for early onset of occupational hearing loss. Indian J Otol. 2015;21:270–273.
  24. 14. Rahmadillah AFP, Arrazy S, Siregar PA. Hubungan intensitas kebisingan dengan gangguan non-auditory pada nelayan di Desa Bogak Kabupaten Batubara. Arter J Ilmu Kesehat. 2024;5:9–15.
  25. 15. Kantu AS, Jusuf H, Prasetya E. Noise level, working duration, and working period with hearing disorder complaints among port workers. Pusat Stud Ilmu Kesehatan FOK UNG. 2022;1:7–8.
  26. 16. Zhou J, Shi Z, Zhou L, Hu Y, Zhang M. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e039576.
  27. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039576
  28. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/9/e039576
  29. 17. Sumardiyono, Wijayanti R, Hartono, Sutomo AH. Noise industrial pollution: health vulnerabilities on textile industry workers. J Kesehat Lingkung. 2019;11:267–275.
  30. 18. Ramadhani PN, Firdausiana YD. Noise exposure and hearing loss on field operator compressor house area. J Kesehat Lingkung. 2020;12:126–135.
  31. 19. Jaksa S, Sasraningrat RMI, DCDK T, RV V. Edukasi bahaya kebisingan pada lingkungan kerja di PT Roda Perdana Utama Karya. J Pengabdian Masy Bangsa. 2025;3:1986–1990.
  32. 20. World Health Organization. Laboratory biosafety manual. 4th ed. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
  33. 21. Novianto ND. Penggunaan alat pelindung diri pada pekerja pengecoran logam PT Sinar Semesta. J Kesehat Masy. 2015;3:417–428.
  34. 22. Chen KH, Su SB, Chen KT. An overview of occupational noise-induced hearing loss among workers: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and preventive measures. Environ Health Prev Med. 2020;25:1–10.
  35. doi:10.1186/s12199-020-00870-x
  36. 23. Peng ZE, Litovsky RY. The role of interaural differences, head shadow, and binaural redundancy in binaural intelligibility benefits among school-aged children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021;25:1–14.
  37. 24. Putri WW, Martiana T. Hubungan usia dan masa kerja dengan nilai ambang dengar pekerja yang terpapar bising di PT X Sidoarjo. Indones J Occup Saf Health. 2016;5:173–182.
  38. 25. Chelsia RA, Suryono H, Nurmayanti D. Pengaruh umur, masa kerja, dan pemakaian APT terhadap ambang pendengaran tenaga kerja konstruksi kapal. Gema Lingkung Kesehat. 2019;17:31–38.
  39. 26. Priyobudi, Ramdhan M, Daryono. Seismicity around Cirata Dam, West Java, Indonesia based on BMKG local seismic network. In: IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021.
  40. Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org
  41. 27. Choirunisa R. Hearing loss and health complaints in air technicians at Iswahjudi Airport associated with aircraft noise. J Kesehat Lingkung. 2019;11:61–68.
  42. 28. Sumardiyono, Wijayanti R, Hartono, Probandari A. The correlation between hearing loss and quality of life of workers exposed to noise in textile industry. Kesmas. 2019;15:81–88.
  43. 29. Adriyani RS. Hubungan pajanan kebisingan dengan tekanan darah dan denyut nadi pada pekerja industri kemasan semen. J Kesehat Lingkung Indones. 2017;16:29–36.
  44. 30. Bashiruddin J. Buku ajar ilmu kesehatan telinga hidung tenggorokan kepala dan leher. Jakarta: FKUI; 2008.