Main Article Content

Abstract

Malaria is an infectious disease caused by five types of Plasmodium and can cause death. Type of plasmodium that is infecting a malaria patient, should be diagnosis exactly in order to treat it properly, and can avoid death. This Malaria RDT iin Sentani Jayapura Regency, Papua Province, which is used in diagnosing malaria in the area. The aims of this study is to determine the specificity and sensitivity of the malaria RDT that used at the Harapan Public Health Center in Jayapura Regency compared to the gold standard (microscopic). This study is an survey descriptive study that describes factually the quality of the used RDT. The tools and materials used were the malaria RDT, slides, microscopes and other supporting materials for malaria microscopic examination. The sample used was finger blood from public health care visitors who had clinical symptoms of malaria. The test results showed that of the 19 samples examined there were 4 true positive samples (RDT and microscopic), and 13 true negative samples (RDT and microscopic), and 2 samples read invalid on RDT, but on microscopic examination it read negative. From the results of these readings, the sensitivity and specificity values ​​were obtained at 100%. The conclusion of this activity is that RDT is still effective as a malaria diagnostic tool that can detect it quickly and accurately, especially in high endemic areas such as Papua.

Keywords

Malaria RDT validity spesificity sensitivity

Article Details

How to Cite
Tulak, Z. L. (2021) “Validity of Rapid Diagnostic Test for Malaria Screening at Puskesmas Harapan Jayapura Regency”, Miracle Journal of Public Health , 4(1), pp. 21-28. doi: 10.36566/mjph/Vol4.Iss1/245.

References

  1. 1. Fitriany J, Sabiq A. Malaria. Averrous. 2018;4(2):1–20.
  2. 2. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2019 [Internet]. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI; 2020. Available from: http://www.kemkes.co.id
  3. 3. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Situasi Terkini Perkembangan Program Pengendalian Malaria di Indonesia Tahun 2018. Kementerian Kesehatan RI;
  4. 4. Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Jayapura. Data Malaria Kabupaten Jayapura Tahun 2016-2018. 2019.
  5. 5. Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Papua. Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Papua Tahun 2019 [Internet]. Kabupaten Jayapura: Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Papua; [cited 2021 Jun 6]. Available from: https://dinkes.papua.go.id/informasi-publik/informasi-berkala/
  6. 6. Wilayah-wilayah Endemis Malaria Tinggi di Indonesia | Malaria.id [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 29]. Available from: https://www.malaria.id/artikel/wilayah-wilayah-endemis-malaria-tinggi-di-indonesia
  7. 7. Laporan Mikroskopis Fasyankes Provinsi Papua Tahun 2020. e-SISMAL Subdit Malaria Dirjen Pencegahan dan Pengendalian Penyakit Kemenkes RI;
  8. 8. Rakhman MA, Istiana, Al Audhah N. Perbandingan Efektifitas Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) Dengan Pemeriksaan Mikroskop Pada Penderita Malaria Klinis. Berkala Kedokteran. 9(1).
  9. 9. Ritung N, Pijoh VD, Bernadus JBB. Perbandingan Efektifitas Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) dengan oemeriksaan Mikroskop pada Penderita Malaria Klinis di Puskesmas Mubune Kecamatan Likupang Barat. e-Bm. 2018 Jul;6(2):84–9.
  10. 10. Siahaan L. Perbandingan Rapid Diagnostic Test dan Pemeriksaan Mikroskopik pada Diagnosis Malaria. Kesmas: National Public Health Journal. 2011 Jun 1;5(6):250.
  11. 11. Makiah H. Perbedaan Efektifitas Metode Mikroskopis dan Metode Rapid Diagnostic Test Terhadap Penegakan Diagnosis Malaria di Puskesmas Sambaliung. Mahakam Medical Laboratory Technology Journal. 2017 Nov;11(2):91–103.
  12. 12. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Pedoman Teknis Pemeriksaan Parasit Malaria [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://www.slideshare.net/hersu12345/buku-pedoman-teknis-pemeriksaan-parasit-malaria